Last week I wrote a post about a report on N.J.’s segregated schools by Professor Gary Orfield et. al. which I found vacuous and flawed, particularly its conclusion that charter schools increase segregation because they cluster in districts that serve children of color. I noted that  “the reasons why more Black families are enthusiastic about charter school culture is beyond the scope of my blog post.” (Also, I’m not Black and, therefore, not an authentic voice.)  On Monday the Associated Press published an article right in tune with Orfield: “charter schools,” said the A.P., “are among the nation’s most segregated, an outcome at odds, critics say, with their goal of offering a better alternative to failing traditional public schools.” 

Luckily my colleague Tanesha Peeples, the Deputy Director of Outreach for Education Post, took on the A.P., as well as Orfield and his ilk.  Her response is below. Tanesha was born and raised on the South Side of Chicago, is a Chicago Public Schools (CPS) alumna and proud Englewoodian. Her vision is one where everyone—regardless of ethnicity, socioeconomic status, gender or zip code—can have access to a comfortable quality of life and enjoy the freedoms and liberties promised to all Americans.

Take it away, Tanesha!

Hey, guess what? That whole school reform thing? They’ve figured it out.

That’s right, it turns out all students can achieve, excel academically and grow to be well-rounded, successful adults…as long as they attend integrated schools.

Sure, we’ve all seen the research. Not only can kids of color benefit from being in a diverse school, so can the White kids.

But wait. People are making it sound like you can drop a bunch of Black kids in schools with a bunch of White kids and boom—the systemic inequities and public policy failures that have deeply segregated our cities for generations suddenly vanish.

I can’t see it happening like that.

For instance, the other day I saw this report from the UCLA Civil Rights Project concluding that integrating public schools in New Jersey was critical to improving educational outcomes for Black students.

Hey, I’m not against strategies that bring diverse people together. But these guys basically deliver a report that would read to Black people as: “Your child would do better academically and be more socially evolved if they went to school with White kids.”

When I want to know what’s up in New Jersey, I turn to Laura Waters, who’s been blogging there for more than a decade. And she’s not buying it. Not only does she see a bunch of influence and dollars from teachers unions and groups who want to keep things the same, but she points out that the report provides no real-world solutions that we could actually, like, do.

CHARTER SEGREGATION? REALLY?

So I was thinking maybe I should write a response to that UCLA report—and then over the weekend comes a piece published by The Associated Press (AP) that straight up blames charter schools for increasing segregation in schools.

BREAKING: Schools that try to educate poorest kids are full of our poorest kids. https://t.co/BYP1oxy2K9

— Eric Celeste (@EricCeleste) December 4, 2017

Crazy, right? I mean, where was AP during…I don’t know, maybe the entire history of public education in America?

I mean, let’s keep it real. Even after Brown v. Board sought to integrate our public schools, generations of racist housing policies have enforced hyper-segregated, high-poverty neighborhoods with struggling, under-resourced schools. Charter schools showed up as one option to provide some (hopefully) better public options for these communities, and most of their students in these neighborhoods are, unsurprisingly, Black and low-income.

Now AP looks at that and says, uh-oh, these charter schools are exacerbating segregation? How about those alternative facts, ladies and gentlemen.

SOUNDING OFF

I don’t know Robin Lake personally, but she got the point across in under 280 characters.

The only thing this @AP story shows is that charter schools are serving the kids we asked them to serve: at-risk populations. It presents no evidence that charters are exacerbating racial segregation. https://t.co/gNVjFh2EfU

— Robin Lake (@RbnLake) December 3, 2017

A responsible local take on the @AP story from the always thoughtful @kystokes. Housing patterns and low-performing neighborhood schools cause school segregation. Absurd to blame charters. https://t.co/oRwa9sDOPa

— Robin Lake (@RbnLake) December 3, 2017

And come to think of it, weren’t charter schools getting slammed for not serving the local communities? Turns out you’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t.

Haters love to claim charters don’t serve neighborhood students & when they do their HW + realize most charters do serve surrounding neighborhood, haters say charters promote racial segregation w/out ever mentioning housing patterns. #whichisit #cantwin https://t.co/yL9ZJkF5LI

— Chris Barbic (@chrisbarbic) December 3, 2017

My colleague, Mike Vaughn, actually read down to the bottom of that AP piece and turns out parents are choosing schools that actually work for their kids. Imagine that.

Charter schools, formed to offer better alternative to district schools/attendance boundaries that screwed families of color, are popular *choices* for families of color. Shocker. “We’re just happy with the results” is the money quote in this story. https://t.co/YK5GxvqXVk

— Michael Vaughn (@VaughnComms) December 4, 2017

And my homie Erika asks where AP was when she was attending a highly-segregated school in a posh suburb.

Hey @AP: I never heard you call my schools segregated growing up. What's the deal? https://t.co/oFZ3043nyR @YahooNews @alexanderrusso

— Erika Sanzi (@esanzi) December 4, 2017

A real drop-the-mic moment on Twitter was when Chris Stewart came with the heat, suggesting that people either put up or shut up.

If the authors, researchers, college professors, labor activists, and others really care about "segregation," they will immediately enroll their children in the blackest, poorest school they can find.

Don't talk us to death. Put your kid where your mouth is people. https://t.co/5gMSDfBUHE

— Citizen Chris (@citizenstewart) December 4, 2017

We won't let you scapegoat black and brown parents for "segregation" because we choose charter schools. The invisible hand of white family choice is 100% responsible for segregation. Don't come for our choice until you address that reality.

— Citizen Chris (@citizenstewart) December 4, 2017

Oh, and schools with predominantly Black student bodies can work. After all, historically-Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) have been winning since way back when Black people weren’t allowed to attend public universities.

Here is a list of a few popular schools that are "segregated":

1. Morehouse
2. Howard
3. Spelman
4. Tuskegee
5. Xavier
6. Clark Atlanta
7. Dillard

Shall we close them down and send their students to predominantly white institutions so they can be saved by integration? https://t.co/5gMSDfBUHE

— Citizen Chris (@citizenstewart) December 4, 2017

But my favorite, Howard Fuller, came through and reminded us of what this is really all about.

The issue for low income Black children is how to get an effective education. I don’t oppose integration. I support excellent education for poor Black children wherever they can find it. Blaming charter schools for the lack of integration is bogus. https://t.co/dCMKczA1Qk

— Howard Fuller (@HowardLFuller) December 3, 2017